Stanley Francis Silva v. United States
394 F.2d 3, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7301
Opinion
The defendant’s in-custody confession was inadmissible for lack of a Miranda- type warning, inasmuch as his trial was commenced post -Miranda. Miranda v. State of Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966).
The judgment of conviction is reversed and the case remanded for a new trial. Johnson v. State of New Jersey, 384 U.S. 719, 721, 86 S.Ct. 1772, 16 L.Ed.2d 882 (1966). Cf. Groshart v. United States, 392 F.2d 172, (9th Cir. 1968).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stanley Francis Silva v. United States, 394 F.2d 3, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7301 (9th Cir. 1968).
394 F.2d 3 (Stanley Francis Silva v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Miranda v. Arizona
384 U.S. 436 (Supreme Court, 1966)
Johnson v. New Jersey
384 U.S. 719 (Supreme Court, 1966)
Jerry Warren Groshart v. United States
392 F.2d 172 (Ninth Circuit, 1968)