Stanley Francis Silva v. United States

Ninth Circuit

Stanley Francis Silva v. United States

394 F.2d 3, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7301

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedApril 16, 1968

Docket21978_1

StatusPublished

This text of 394 F.2d 3 (Stanley Francis Silva v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stanley Francis Silva v. United States, 394 F.2d 3, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7301 (9th Cir. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The defendant’s in-custody confession was inadmissible for lack of a Miranda- type warning, inasmuch as his trial was commenced post -Miranda. Miranda v. State of Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966).

The judgment of conviction is reversed and the case remanded for a new trial. Johnson v. State of New Jersey, 384 U.S. 719, 721, 86 S.Ct. 1772, 16 L.Ed.2d 882 (1966). Cf. Groshart v. United States, 392 F.2d 172, (9th Cir. 1968).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The defendant’s in-custody confession was inadmissible for lack of a Miranda- type warning, inasmuch as his trial was commenced post -Miranda. Miranda v. State of Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966).

The judgment of conviction is reversed and the case remanded for a new trial. Johnson v. State of New Jersey, 384 U.S. 719, 721, 86 S.Ct. 1772, 16 L.Ed.2d 882 (1966). Cf. Groshart v. United States, 392 F.2d 172, (9th Cir. 1968).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

394 F.2d 3, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stanley-francis-silva-v-united-states-ca9-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack