Stanley E. Hay v. Helen Jennings Cathy Short Patrick Sullivan John Kelly Martin
This text of 56 F.3d 68 (Stanley E. Hay v. Helen Jennings Cathy Short Patrick Sullivan John Kelly Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
56 F.3d 68
NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.
Stanley E. HAY, Appellant,
v.
Helen JENNINGS; Cathy Short; Patrick Sullivan; Appellees.
John Kelly Martin, Defendant.
No. 94-3594
United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: May 5, 1995
Filed: May 12, 1995
Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Stanley E. Hay appeals from the district court's1 order dismissing with prejudice his pro se 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action based on conspiracy to deprive him of constitutionally protected rights. After a careful review of the record, we agree with the district court that Hay failed to allege "defendants had directed themselves toward an unconstitutional action by virtue of a mutual understanding," and failed to provide "facts suggesting a meeting of the minds." See Smith v. Bacon, 699 F.2d 434, 436 (8th Cir. 1983) (per curiam) (internal quotations omitted). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
The Honorable Joseph E. Stevens, Jr., Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 F.3d 68, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23324, 1995 WL 276887, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stanley-e-hay-v-helen-jennings-cathy-short-patrick-ca8-1995.