Stanley Dobbs v. Equifax Information Services, LLC; Lending USA, LLC, et al.

District Court, E.D. California·Decided January 9, 2026·No. 1:25-cv-01451·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STANLEY DOBBS, Case No. 1:25-cv-01451-SAB Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO TERMINATE DEFENDANT EQUIFAX v. INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC LENDING USA, LLC, et al., (ECF No. 12) Defendants. On January 8, 2026, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal of the action with prejudice as to Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. “[U]nder Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), ‘a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss his action prior to service by the defendant of an answer or a motion for summary judgment.’” Commercial Space Mgmt. Co., Inc. v. Boeing Co., Inc., 193 F.3d 1074, 1077 (9th Cir. 1999), quoting Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). “[A] dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) is effective on filing, no court order is required, the parties are left as though no action had been brought, the defendant can’t complain, and the district court lacks jurisdiction to do anything about it.” Id. at 1078; see also Pedrina v. Chun, 987 F.2d 608, 609 (9th Cir. 1993). In this action, no defendant has filed an answer, other responsive pleading, or motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to TERMINATE Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC, in this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. F- 2 Se Dated: _ January 9, 2026 STANLEY A. BOONE United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stanley Dobbs v. Equifax Information Services, LLC; Lending USA, LLC, et al., (E.D. Cal. 2026).

Stanley Dobbs v. Equifax Information Services, LLC; Lending USA, LLC, et al. (Stanley Dobbs v. Equifax Information Services, LLC; Lending USA, LLC, et al.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pedrina v. Chun
987 F.2d 608 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)
Wilson v. City of San Jose
111 F.3d 688 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)