Stanley, David Earl

Opinion

$-OSS-Sf>ulL-SJiJ / : ___ it«^;!jov_U^23io7_— RECEIVED IW COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS MJ Aca^rfsr^ JUN162015

/- Cr>,A*?/uM- r?- gfo-aa

f^&xA^Tifc 1 ti^WUx y^ PU^g •'fc^iA¥HPc^T^>'/Kxi. d.Co^ycjP flGl che#>rf- Sbo/nx reiUJkx^ -fe ^ii ^JL^ r^f^egwoziK rthJfoAZ r/w^ ^Jtuot^osi fz^Yooe^&Adtei\)fteJak/'~fl/ry*l UsJ&L O^MlS-ie^C-QJ S i^cxipcj.j f f]A a 41 10ajovsV2AXc^3C • -'

•,'--• ,

••.''•

•-• • ;" , "•

. . . * , x

r .

' t ' ' J , ;