Stanley Dale Sydow v. United States

Eighth Circuit

Stanley Dale Sydow v. United States

202 F.2d 752

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 4, 1953

Docket14730_1

StatusPublished

This text of 202 F.2d 752 (Stanley Dale Sydow v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stanley Dale Sydow v. United States, 202 F.2d 752 (8th Cir. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

202 F.2d 752

Stanley Dale SYDOW, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America.

No. 14730.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

Feb. 4, 1953.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from District Court dismissed, on motion of appellee and motion of appellant pro se.

Fyke Farmer, Nashville, Tenn., and Thomas P. Kelley, Omaha, Neb., for appellant.

Joseph T. Votava, U.S. Atty., and Edward J. Tangney, Asst. U.S. Atty., Omaha, Neb., for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

202 F.2d 752

Stanley Dale SYDOW, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America.

No. 14730.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

Feb. 4, 1953.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from District Court dismissed, on motion of appellee and motion of appellant pro se.

Fyke Farmer, Nashville, Tenn., and Thomas P. Kelley, Omaha, Neb., for appellant.

Joseph T. Votava, U.S. Atty., and Edward J. Tangney, Asst. U.S. Atty., Omaha, Neb., for appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

202 F.2d 752, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stanley-dale-sydow-v-united-states-ca8-1953.