Stanley D. Miroyiannis v. Wyeth, Inc

Third Circuit

Stanley D. Miroyiannis v. Wyeth, Inc

253 F.2d 849, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 3941

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedApril 10, 1958

Docket12350

StatusPublished

This text of 253 F.2d 849 (Stanley D. Miroyiannis v. Wyeth, Inc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stanley D. Miroyiannis v. Wyeth, Inc, 253 F.2d 849, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 3941 (3d Cir. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment for the defendant in a suit brought by the plaintiff to recover for what he claims was a wrongful discharge from his employment by the defendant. The whole case turns upon a question of fact and that fact has to do with the nature of the employment which the plaintiff accepted when he went to work for the defendant company. The trial court has found that the employment was one at will. That conclusion rests upon solid foundation in the evidence. We may not reverse unless the conclusion reached Was clearly erroneous, Fed.Rules Civ. Proc. Rule 52(a), 28 U.S.C.A. There is no such basis for reversal here.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment for the defendant in a suit brought by the plaintiff to recover for what he claims was a wrongful discharge from his employment by the defendant. The whole case turns upon a question of fact and that fact has to do with the nature of the employment which the plaintiff accepted when he went to work for the defendant company. The trial court has found that the employment was one at will. That conclusion rests upon solid foundation in the evidence. We may not reverse unless the conclusion reached Was clearly erroneous, Fed.Rules Civ. Proc. Rule 52(a), 28 U.S.C.A. There is no such basis for reversal here.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

253 F.2d 849, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 3941, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stanley-d-miroyiannis-v-wyeth-inc-ca3-1958.