Stanley Bradford Whittington v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 16, 2013·No. 13-13-00169-CR·Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-13-00169-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

STANLEY BRADFORD WHITTINGTON, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 2nd 25th District Court of Gonzales County, Texas.

ORDER OF ABATEMENT Before Justices Benavides, Perkes, and Longoria Order Per Curiam

This matter is before the Court on appellant’s “Motion to Abate Appeal and Order

the Trial Court to Enter Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.” According to

appellant, this matter should be abated and remanded for purposes of conducting a

hearing regarding whether appellant was properly advised regarding the “dangers of multiple representation.” More than ten days have passed and the State has not filed a

response to this motion.

Accordingly, we GRANT the motion to abate. We ABATE this appeal and

REMAND the cause to the trial court for the purposes of conducting a hearing regarding

this issue. The trial court should prepare findings of fact and conclusions of law and

include them in a supplemental clerk's record. Furthermore, the trial court shall cause a

supplemental reporter's record of any proceedings to be prepared. The supplemental

clerk's record and supplemental reporter's record, if any, shall be filed with the Clerk of

this Court on or before the expiration thirty days from the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 16th day of December, 2013.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stanley Bradford Whittington v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Stanley Bradford Whittington v. State (Stanley Bradford Whittington v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.