Stanko v. Obama

178 L. Ed. 2d 742, 131 S. Ct. 948, 562 U.S. 1131, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 569, 79 U.S.L.W. 3402
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 10, 2011
DocketNo. 10-7548
StatusPublished

This text of 178 L. Ed. 2d 742 (Stanko v. Obama) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stanko v. Obama, 178 L. Ed. 2d 742, 131 S. Ct. 948, 562 U.S. 1131, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 569, 79 U.S.L.W. 3402 (U.S. 2011).

Opinion

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fees required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam).

Same case below, 393 Fed. Appx. 849.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals
506 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1992)
Rudolph Stanko v. Barack Obama
393 F. App'x 849 (Third Circuit, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
178 L. Ed. 2d 742, 131 S. Ct. 948, 562 U.S. 1131, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 569, 79 U.S.L.W. 3402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stanko-v-obama-scotus-2011.