Stanko v. Davis

Supreme Court

Stanko v. Davis

178 L. Ed. 2d 742, 131 S. Ct. 973, 562 U.S. 1131, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 313, 79 U.S.L.W. 3402

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJanuary 10, 2011

DocketNo. 10-7804

StatusPublished

This text of 178 L. Ed. 2d 742 (Stanko v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stanko v. Davis, 178 L. Ed. 2d 742, 131 S. Ct. 973, 562 U.S. 1131, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 313, 79 U.S.L.W. 3402 (U.S. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit dismissed. See Rule [743]*74339.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam).

Same case below, 617 F.3d 1262.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit dismissed. See Rule [743]*74339.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam).

Same case below, 617 F.3d 1262.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

178 L. Ed. 2d 742, 131 S. Ct. 973, 562 U.S. 1131, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 313, 79 U.S.L.W. 3402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stanko-v-davis-scotus-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack