Stankey v. Boden

California Court of Appeal

Stankey v. Boden

130 Cal. App. 454

California Court of Appeal·Decided March 20, 1933·No. Civ. No. 7641·Published

Opinion

STEPHENS, J.

The order appealed from followed a motion to dismiss an action for lack of prosecution. Appellant, whose action was dismissed, seeks to show by affidavit that the delay of over two years was caused by her attorneys and also by the fact that the defendant wrote her a letter in which it was stated that the writer would proceed with the case. The whole question was one of discretion of the trial judge and we discern no abuse thereof.

The order is affirmed.

Works, P. J., and Archbald, J., pro teto., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

STEPHENS, J.

The order appealed from followed a motion to dismiss an action for lack of prosecution. Appellant, whose action was dismissed, seeks to show by affidavit that the delay of over two years was caused by her attorneys and also by the fact that the defendant wrote her a letter in which it was stated that the writer would proceed with the case. The whole question was one of discretion of the trial judge and we discern no abuse thereof.

The order is affirmed.

Works, P. J., and Archbald, J., pro teto., concurred.

Stankey v. Boden, 130 Cal. App. 454 (Cal. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

130 Cal. App. 454 (Stankey v. Boden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.