Stankey v. Boden

California Court of Appeal

Stankey v. Boden

20 P.2d 50, 130 Cal. App. 454, 1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 888

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedMarch 20, 1933

DocketDocket No. 7641.

StatusPublished

This text of 20 P.2d 50 (Stankey v. Boden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stankey v. Boden, 20 P.2d 50, 130 Cal. App. 454, 1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 888 (Cal. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

The order appealed from followed a motion to dismiss an action for lack of prosecution. [1] Appellant, whose action was dismissed, seeks to show by affidavit that the delay of over two years was caused by her attorneys and also by the fact that the defendant wrote her a letter in which it was stated that the writer would proceed with the case. The whole question was one of discretion of the trial judge and we discern no abuse thereof.

The order is affirmed.

Works, P.J., and Archbald, J., pro tem., concurred. *Page 455

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The order appealed from followed a motion to dismiss an action for lack of prosecution. [1] Appellant, whose action was dismissed, seeks to show by affidavit that the delay of over two years was caused by her attorneys and also by the fact that the defendant wrote her a letter in which it was stated that the writer would proceed with the case. The whole question was one of discretion of the trial judge and we discern no abuse thereof.

The order is affirmed.

Works, P.J., and Archbald, J., pro tem., concurred. *Page 455

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 P.2d 50, 130 Cal. App. 454, 1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 888, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stankey-v-boden-calctapp-1933.