Stanford v. United States
This text of Stanford v. United States (Stanford v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
SUSAN STANFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee ______________________
2016-1990 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:15-cv-00123-SGB, Chief Judge Susan G. Braden. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
MICHAEL D. SYDOW, SR., The Sydow Firm, Houston, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant.
MARIANA TERESA ACEVEDO, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by BENJAMIN C. MIZER, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., BRIAN A. MIZOGUCHI. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and LINN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
July 19, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Stanford v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stanford-v-united-states-cafc-2017.