Stanford v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Stanford v. State

102 S.E. 381, 25 Ga. App. 32, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 578

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 3, 1920

Docket11186

StatusPublished

This text of 102 S.E. 381 (Stanford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stanford v. State, 102 S.E. 381, 25 Ga. App. 32, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 578 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. The excerpts from the charge of the court, complained of, when considered in the light of the entire charge, and of the facts of the case, contain no reversible error.

2. Under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this ’ court, a general exception to the entire charge of the court is too broad to he considered, unless the whole charge was erroneous.

3. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the court did not err.in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ.; concur.

Application for certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court.

M. L. Felts, for plaintiff in error. R. C. Norman, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI