Stanford v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Stanford v. State

884 So. 2d 400, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 14160, 2004 WL 2112725

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 24, 2004

DocketNo. 2D04-2345

StatusPublished

This text of 884 So. 2d 400 (Stanford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stanford v. State, 884 So. 2d 400, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 14160, 2004 WL 2112725 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Terry v. State, 808 So.2d 1249 (Fla.2002); McCall v. State, 862 So.2d 807 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); O’Neal v. State, 862 So.2d 91 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Cook v. State, 816 So.2d 773 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Shaw v. State, 780 So.2d 188 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).

As this court did in McCall, we certify direct conflict with Richardson v. State, 2003 WL 21697171, 884 So.2d 950 (Fla. 4th DCA July 23, 2003), supplemented on rehearing, 884 So.2d 950 (Fla. 4th DCA Jan.14, 2004).

Affirmed; conflict certified.

CASANUEVA, SALCINES, and SILBERMAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI