Stanford v. State
884 So. 2d 400, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 14160, 2004 WL 2112725
Opinion
Affirmed. See Terry v. State, 808 So.2d 1249 (Fla.2002); McCall v. State, 862 So.2d 807 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); O’Neal v. State, 862 So.2d 91 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Cook v. State, 816 So.2d 773 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Shaw v. State, 780 So.2d 188 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).
As this court did in McCall, we certify direct conflict with Richardson v. State, 2003 WL 21697171, 884 So.2d 950 (Fla. 4th DCA July 23, 2003), supplemented on rehearing, 884 So.2d 950 (Fla. 4th DCA Jan.14, 2004).
Affirmed; conflict certified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stanford v. State, 884 So. 2d 400, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 14160, 2004 WL 2112725 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
884 So. 2d 400 (Stanford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Richardson v. State
884 So. 2d 950 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Shaw v. State
780 So. 2d 188 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Terry v. State
808 So. 2d 1249 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)
Cook v. State
816 So. 2d 773 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
McCall v. State
862 So. 2d 807 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
O'NEAL v. State
862 So. 2d 91 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)