Stanford v. State
611 So. 2d 625, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 674, 1993 WL 17729
Opinion
Tyrone Stanford appeals his two sentences as a habitual felony offender. He received two ten year consecutive terms of imprisonment, resulting from revocation of probation. We affirm the sentences on the authority of Marshall v. State, 596 So.2d 114 (Fla. 2d DCA1992), and King v. State, 597 So.2d 309 (Fla. 2d DCA1991). We recognize affirming the sentences upon revocation of “habitualized” probation is in conflict with State v. Kendrick, 596 So.2d 1153 (Fla. 5th DCA1992).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stanford v. State, 611 So. 2d 625, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 674, 1993 WL 17729 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).
611 So. 2d 625 (Stanford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
King v. State
597 So. 2d 309 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
State v. Kendrick
596 So. 2d 1153 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Marshall v. State
596 So. 2d 114 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)