Stanford, O., PBPP
This text of Stanford, O., PBPP (Stanford, O., PBPP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
ORLANDO STANFORD, : No. 47 WM 2016 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : PA. PAROLE BOARDS; DISTRICT : ATTORNEY JAMES LAZAR; WARDEN, : GILMORE, SCI-GREENE; : WESTMORELAND COUNTY, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 20th day of June, 2016, the Application for Leave to File Original
Process, the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the Petition for an Instant Hearing, the
Application for Leave to File an Answer to the Commonwealth’s Answer, and the
Application for Leave to File Objection of Right are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v.
Reid, 642 A.2d 453 (Pa. 1994) (explaining that hybrid representation is not permitted).
The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Stanford, O., PBPP, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stanford-o-pbpp-pa-2016.