Stanford, O., PBPP
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
ORLANDO STANFORD, : No. 47 WM 2016 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : PA. PAROLE BOARDS; DISTRICT : ATTORNEY JAMES LAZAR; WARDEN, : GILMORE, SCI-GREENE; : WESTMORELAND COUNTY, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 20th day of June, 2016, the Application for Leave to File Original
Process, the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the Petition for an Instant Hearing, the
Application for Leave to File an Answer to the Commonwealth’s Answer, and the
Application for Leave to File Objection of Right are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v.
Reid, 642 A.2d 453 (Pa. 1994) (explaining that hybrid representation is not permitted).
The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stanford, O., PBPP (Stanford, O., PBPP) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.