Stanford, O., PBPP

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 20, 2016·No. 47 WM 2016·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

ORLANDO STANFORD, : No. 47 WM 2016 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : PA. PAROLE BOARDS; DISTRICT : ATTORNEY JAMES LAZAR; WARDEN, : GILMORE, SCI-GREENE; : WESTMORELAND COUNTY, : : Respondents :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 20th day of June, 2016, the Application for Leave to File Original

Process, the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the Petition for an Instant Hearing, the

Application for Leave to File an Answer to the Commonwealth’s Answer, and the

Application for Leave to File Objection of Right are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v.

Reid, 642 A.2d 453 (Pa. 1994) (explaining that hybrid representation is not permitted).

The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stanford, O., PBPP, (Pa. 2016).

Stanford, O., PBPP (Stanford, O., PBPP) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Reid
642 A.2d 453 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1994)