Stanford C. Todd v. Christine M. David
This text of Stanford C. Todd v. Christine M. David (Stanford C. Todd v. Christine M. David) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISMISSED
SEPTEMBER 13, 1990
NO. 10-90-116-CV
Trial Court
# 24,503
IN THE
COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE
TENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT WACO
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
STANFORD C. TODD,
Appellant
v.
CHRISTINE M. DAVID,
Appellee
From 52nd Judicial District Court
Coryell County, Texas
O P I N I O N
* * * * * * *
On May 3, 1990, Stanford Todd, Appellant, was held in contempt for failing to pay child support and assessed 78 months in jail and a $6,500 fine. However, on that date the court suspended imposition of the commitment order, and placed him on probation for five years.
Appellant has attempted a direct appeal of the May 3rd order to this court.
A decree of contempt, though probated or suspended, constitutes a restraint on one's liberty. Ex parte Conner, 746 S.W.2d 527 (Tex. App.--Beaumont 1988) (abating appeal). Such an order can lead to incarceration and is thus quasi-criminal in nature. Ex parte Conner, 749 S.W.2d 241, 242 (Tex. App.--Beaumont 1988, no writ). This court does not have jurisdiction over a direct appeal from such an order. Wagner v. Warnasch, 156 Tex. 334, 295 S.W.2d 890 (1956); Ex parte Dillard, 577 S.W.2d 519, 520 (Tex. Civ. App.--Texarkana 1979, no writ).
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Stanford C. Todd v. Christine M. David, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stanford-c-todd-v-christine-m-david-texapp-1990.