Stanford Anthony Shane v. Howard Beyers, Attorney General of North Carolina

833 F.2d 310, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 14586, 1987 WL 38942
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 4, 1987
Docket87-7254
StatusUnpublished

This text of 833 F.2d 310 (Stanford Anthony Shane v. Howard Beyers, Attorney General of North Carolina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stanford Anthony Shane v. Howard Beyers, Attorney General of North Carolina, 833 F.2d 310, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 14586, 1987 WL 38942 (4th Cir. 1987).

Opinion

833 F.2d 310
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Stanford Anthony SHANE, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Howard BEYERS, Attorney General of North Carolina,
Respondents-Appellees.

No. 87-7254.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 30, 1987.
Decided Nov. 4, 1987.

Stanford Anthony Shane, appellant pro se.

Richard Norwood League, Office of Attorney General, for appellees.

Before K.K. HALL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Stanford A. Shane, a New Jersey prisoner, seeks to appeal from the district court's order dismissing his pro se application for habeas corpus relief. The district court determined that Shane had not exhausted his state court remedies and dismissed the petition on that basis. The district court order does not reflect that the dismissal was without prejudice.

We agree with the district court that Shane has not exhausted his state court remedies. However, the dismissal should be without prejudice. Therefore, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2106 we modify the district court's order to reflect that the dismissal is without prejudice and affirm the judgment as modified. A certificate of probable cause to appeal is granted. We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
833 F.2d 310, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 14586, 1987 WL 38942, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stanford-anthony-shane-v-howard-beyers-attorney-general-of-north-carolina-ca4-1987.