Stanfield v. Town of Hamburg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Stanfield v. Town of Hamburg

137 A.D. 880

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 15, 1909·Published

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs. Al) concurred; McLennan, P. J., upon the ground that it would not be proper'to reinstate the verdict, but is of the opinion that the question of defendant’s negli- ' geuce and-the question of the intestate’s freedom from contributory negligence ■ are questions of fact for the jury; Spring, J., on the ground that the..plaintiff failed to establish the negligence of the defendant or the intestate’s freedom from contributory negligence. '

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with costs. Al) concurred; McLennan, P. J., upon the ground that it would not be proper'to reinstate the verdict, but is of the opinion that the question of defendant’s negli- ' geuce and-the question of the intestate’s freedom from contributory negligence ■ are questions of fact for the jury; Spring, J., on the ground that the..plaintiff failed to establish the negligence of the defendant or the intestate’s freedom from contributory negligence. '

Stanfield v. Town of Hamburg, 137 A.D. 880 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1909).

Pincite

137 A.D. 880 (Stanfield v. Town of Hamburg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.