Stanfield v. State

153 S.E. 447, 41 Ga. App. 503, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 958
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 14, 1930
Docket20494
StatusPublished

This text of 153 S.E. 447 (Stanfield v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stanfield v. State, 153 S.E. 447, 41 Ga. App. 503, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 958 (Ga. Ct. App. 1930).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. The motion for a new trial was in part based upon alleged newly discovered evidence. In view of the counter-showing made by the State upon the hearing of the motion, the court did not err in overruling this ground.

[504]*504Decided May 14, 1930. G. L. Gowarl, for plaintiff in error. J. T. Grice, solicitor-general, H. H. Elders, contra.

2. The evidence amply authorized the verdict, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke cmd Bloodioorth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
153 S.E. 447, 41 Ga. App. 503, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 958, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stanfield-v-state-gactapp-1930.