Stanfield v. Boyer

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Stanfield v. Boyer

6 H. & J. 248

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedJune 15, 1824

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 6 H. & J. 248 (Stanfield v. Boyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stanfield v. Boyer, 6 H. & J. 248 (Md. 1824).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Martin, J.

Two objections have been made to the judgment of the court below in this case, both of which, we think, are sustained upon established principles of law. The words, as proved by the witnesses, are not in them» selves actionable, and if they were actionable, the variance between them and those laid in the declaration, is fatal.

We do not think it necessary to enter into a minute explanation of this case. The judgment of Baltimore county court is reversed, with costs to the appellant.

JUDGMENT reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Martin, J.

Two objections have been made to the judgment of the court below in this case, both of which, we think, are sustained upon established principles of law. The words, as proved by the witnesses, are not in them» selves actionable, and if they were actionable, the variance between them and those laid in the declaration, is fatal.

We do not think it necessary to enter into a minute explanation of this case. The judgment of Baltimore county court is reversed, with costs to the appellant.

JUDGMENT reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 H. & J. 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stanfield-v-boyer-md-1824.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack