Stanfield v. Boyer
6 H. & J. 248
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Two objections have been made to the judgment of the court below in this case, both of which, we think, are sustained upon established principles of law. The words, as proved by the witnesses, are not in them» selves actionable, and if they were actionable, the variance between them and those laid in the declaration, is fatal.
We do not think it necessary to enter into a minute explanation of this case. The judgment of Baltimore county court is reversed, with costs to the appellant.
JUDGMENT reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stanfield v. Boyer, 6 H. & J. 248 (Md. 1824).
6 H. & J. 248 (Stanfield v. Boyer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hemming v. Elliott
7 A. 110 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1886)
Griffin v. Moore
43 Md. 246 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1875)
Wagaman v. Byers
17 Md. 183 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1861)