Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/STANELY v. State

STANELY v. State

79 So. 3d 77, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 20996, 2011 WL 6846439
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 27, 2011
Docket5D11-740
StatusPublished

This text of 79 So. 3d 77 (STANELY v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
STANELY v. State, 79 So. 3d 77, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 20996, 2011 WL 6846439 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Denson v. State, 775 So.2d 288, 289 (Fla.2000) (extraordinary writ petition cannot be used to litigate or relitigate issues that were or could have been raised on direct appeal or in prior postconviction proceedings).

EVANDER, COHEN and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Denson v. State
775 So. 2d 288 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
79 So. 3d 77, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 20996, 2011 WL 6846439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stanely-v-state-fladistctapp-2011.