Home/Supreme Court/Standring v. Xerox Corp.

Standring v. Xerox Corp.

506 U.S. 1000, 121 L. Ed. 2d 538
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 30, 1992
DocketNo. 92-608
StatusPublished
Cited by27 cases

This text of 506 U.S. 1000 (Standring v. Xerox Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Standring v. Xerox Corp., 506 U.S. 1000, 121 L. Ed. 2d 538 (1992).

Opinion

Ct. App. Ohio, Cuy-ahoga County. Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clarkco Landfill Co. v. Clark County Solid Waste Management District
110 F. Supp. 2d 627 (S.D. Ohio, 1999)
Brown v. Sayyah
219 B.R. 176 (N.D. Texas, 1998)
In Re ICH Corp.
219 B.R. 176 (N.D. Texas, 1998)
Alfred R. Dyer v. Arthur Calderon, Warden
122 F.3d 720 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)
Alfred R. DYER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Arthur CALDERON, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
113 F.3d 927 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)
Gonzales v. Thomas
99 F.3d 978 (Tenth Circuit, 1996)
Daughtry v. Dennehy
946 F. Supp. 1053 (D. Massachusetts, 1996)
Benjamin Franklin Freeman v. Joseph Class, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary Mark W. Barnett, Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
95 F.3d 639 (Eighth Circuit, 1996)
In Re United States Lines, Inc.
199 B.R. 476 (S.D. New York, 1996)
Texas Manufactures Housing Ass'n v. City of La Porte
974 F. Supp. 602 (S.D. Texas, 1996)
National Solid Wastes Management Association v. George Meyer
63 F.3d 652 (Seventh Circuit, 1995)
National Solid Wastes Management Ass'n v. Meyer
63 F.3d 652 (Seventh Circuit, 1995)
City of Cleveland, Ohio v. City of Brook Park, Ohio
893 F. Supp. 742 (N.D. Ohio, 1995)
Blue Circle Cement, Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners of Rogers
917 F. Supp. 1514 (N.D. Oklahoma, 1995)
Paul Matthew Zerka v. Harlon Green
49 F.3d 1181 (Sixth Circuit, 1995)
Instructional Systems, Inc., a Corporation of the State of New Jersey v. Computer Curriculum Corporation, a Corporation of the State of Delaware Instructional Systems, Inc., Deborah T. Poritz, Attorney General of New Jersey, Intervenor (Per the Court's Nov. 19, 1993 Order) Instructional Systems, Inc., a Corporation of the State of New Jersey v. Computer Curriculum Corporation, a Corporation of the State of Delaware v. Hon. Alfred J. Lechner, Jr., United States District Judge for the District of New Jersey, Nominal Deborah T. Poritz, Attorney General of New Jersey, Instructional Systems, Inc., a Corporation of the State of New Jersey v. Computer Curriculum Corporation, a Corporation of the State of Delaware Hon. Alfred J. Lechner, Jr., United States District Judge for the District of New Jersey, Nominal Instructional Systems, Inc., a Corporation of the State of New Jersey v. Computer Curriculum Corporation, a Corporation of the State of Delaware Instructional Systems, Inc., Instructional Systems, Inc., a Corporation of the State of New Jersey v. Computer Curriculum Corporation, a Corporation of the State of Delaware Deborah T. Poritz, Attorney General of New Jersey, Intervenor in D.C.
35 F.3d 813 (Third Circuit, 1994)
Instructional Systems, Inc. v. Computer Curriculum Corp.
35 F.3d 813 (Third Circuit, 1994)
In Re Ridgewood Apartments of DeKalb County, Ltd.
174 B.R. 712 (S.D. Ohio, 1994)
Sherwin-Williams Co. v. City & County of San Francisco
857 F. Supp. 1355 (N.D. California, 1994)
Blue Circle Cement, Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners of the County of Rogers
27 F.3d 1499 (Tenth Circuit, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
506 U.S. 1000, 121 L. Ed. 2d 538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/standring-v-xerox-corp-scotus-1992.