Standley v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Standley v. State

738 S.W.2d 423, 293 Ark. 517, 1987 Ark. LEXIS 2392

DecidedNovember 9, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 738 S.W.2d 423 (Standley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Standley v. State, 738 S.W.2d 423, 293 Ark. 517, 1987 Ark. LEXIS 2392 (Ark. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, James Joseph Standley, Jr., by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk. His attorney, Billy J. Allred, admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant, James Joseph Standley, Jr., by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk. His attorney, Billy J. Allred, admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

738 S.W.2d 423, 293 Ark. 517, 1987 Ark. LEXIS 2392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/standley-v-state-ark-1987.