Standish v. Standish
This text of 40 So. 3d 919 (Standish v. Standish) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Wayne L. Standish, the former husband, appeals the final judgment dissolving his marriage to Susan Standish, the former wife. Having carefully considered the issues raised by the former husband, we find no reversible error and affirm. We do, however, agree with the former husband that the final judgment contains a scrivener’s error that should be corrected on remand.
The parties owned as marital assets, two MetLife annuities with roughly equal values. The body of the final judgment awarded the former husband the MetLife annuity with an account number ending in 4547. The former wife was awarded the MetLife annuity with an account number ending in 4543. However, in the equitable distribution table attached as exhibit A to the final judgment, the annuity account numbers were transposed. On remand, the trial court shall correct this scrivener’s error. In all other respects, the final judgment is affirmed.
AFFIRMED; REMANDED FOR CORRECTION OF SCRIVENER’S ERROR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
40 So. 3d 919, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11091, 2010 WL 2975412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/standish-v-standish-fladistctapp-2010.