Standart Bros. v. Ingham Circuit Judge

127 N.W. 922, 163 Mich. 106, 1910 Mich. LEXIS 575
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 5, 1910
DocketCalendar No. 24,266
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 127 N.W. 922 (Standart Bros. v. Ingham Circuit Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Standart Bros. v. Ingham Circuit Judge, 127 N.W. 922, 163 Mich. 106, 1910 Mich. LEXIS 575 (Mich. 1910).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The circuit court, in chancery, having control of the receiver of a corporation and of the fund in his hands, may exercise discretion in permitting, or in refusing to permit, the receiver to employ the fund in litiga[107]*107tion desired by some of tbe creditors of the corporation and not desired by others. The exercise, of this discretion will be influenced by the apparent hazard of the litigation proposed to be carried on. We see no reason for saying that discretion was not properly exercised by the court below, in view of all the circumstances disclosed, in refusing the receiver permission to employ the fund in the litigation proposed to be carried on. But the considerations which support the ruling of the court in this respect also require the order which was made to be modified, because it is inequitable to permit the receiver to proceed only upon the condition that all costs and expenses to be made shall be secured and paid by petitioning creditors desiring the litigation, and to deny such creditors, and others who may care to contribute, the right to be first paid out of the fund, if any, which shall be the result of the litigation.

The order will be so modified as to provide that all creditors of the corporation contributing to the costs and expenses of the litigation shall be first paid, not only disbursements but their unpaid demands, out of any moneys recovered by said receiver. No costs are awarded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pettinger v. Montmorency Circuit Judge
129 N.W. 676 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1911)
Kaiser v. Detroit United Railway
128 N.W. 1 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
127 N.W. 922, 163 Mich. 106, 1910 Mich. LEXIS 575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/standart-bros-v-ingham-circuit-judge-mich-1910.