Standard Wine & Liquor Co. v. United States
Opinion
[454]*454Opinion by
At the trial it was stipulated that the merchandise, issues, and facts herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc. (34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the three cases of vermuth reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, w^ere not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that duty and internal revenue tax are not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protest was sustained to this extent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
32 Cust. Ct. 453 (Standard Wine & Liquor Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.