Standard v. Williams

New York Supreme Court

Standard v. Williams

10 Wend. 599

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 15, 1833

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 10 Wend. 599 (Standard v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Standard v. Williams, 10 Wend. 599 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1833).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court,

Nelson, J.

The affidavit of the plaintiff, alleging the suit to be settled, is a perfect answer to the motion* and it therefore must be denied. If the affidavit be untrue, or if the transaction upon which the allegation of the plaintiff be founded can be explained, so as to show that no settlement did in fact take place, the defendant may apply to the court upon a notice to vacate the rule denying his motion, but the motion now made cannot be continued over to another term.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court,

Nelson, J.

The affidavit of the plaintiff, alleging the suit to be settled, is a perfect answer to the motion* and it therefore must be denied. If the affidavit be untrue, or if the transaction upon which the allegation of the plaintiff be founded can be explained, so as to show that no settlement did in fact take place, the defendant may apply to the court upon a notice to vacate the rule denying his motion, but the motion now made cannot be continued over to another term.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 Wend. 599, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/standard-v-williams-nysupct-1833.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack