Standard Triumph Motor Co. v. United States Lines Co. & The S.S. American Manufacturer

192 F. Supp. 618, 1961 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3130
CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedJanuary 18, 1961
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 192 F. Supp. 618 (Standard Triumph Motor Co. v. United States Lines Co. & The S.S. American Manufacturer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Standard Triumph Motor Co. v. United States Lines Co. & The S.S. American Manufacturer, 192 F. Supp. 618, 1961 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3130 (S.D.N.Y. 1961).

Opinion

WEINFELD, District Judge.

Libelant, a Delaware corporation, sues respondent, a New Jersey corporation, to recover damages to imported automobiles. The claimed damage occurred in the storage area of Pier 1, Boston, Massachusetts.

All the witnesses to be called upon the trial, whether employees of libelant, respondent, the Port Authority which operated the pier, and those of the Railroad Company which leased the pier, reside in or about Boston. There is no claim that a single witness is located in this District. About the only contact with this District is the circumstance that the proctors for libelant maintain offices here. Under section 1404(a) of Title 28, it is “the convenience of parties and witnesses” — and not that of attorneys which is the significant factor.

In the exercise of discretion, the motion for transfer is granted.

Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Roller Bearing Company of America v. Bearings, Inc.
260 F. Supp. 639 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
192 F. Supp. 618, 1961 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/standard-triumph-motor-co-v-united-states-lines-co-the-ss-american-nysd-1961.