Standard Tile Co. v. O'Mara

256 A.D. 1096, 11 N.Y.S.2d 603, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6259
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 17, 1939·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Order denying motion for the vacatur of an order directing the payment to the Standard Tile Company, Inc., of moneys deposited to discharge a mechanic’s lien and requiring restitution thereof to Malba Park, Inc., which deposited the money, reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, without costs. The order directing the payment of the moneys deposited to the lienor was made without warrant of law. The provision in section 20 of the Lien Law authorizing the payment of such moneys to a lienor contemplates the making of such payment after the lienor has established the validity of its lien. Here the lienor did not estabHsh that fact and the order it obtained was without warrant in law. When the depositor of the money moved for the vacatur the Hen had lapsed because it had not been extended by order and no action to enforce it had been begun within one year after the notice of Hen was filed. Lazansky, P. J., CarsweU, Adel, Taylor and Close. JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Standard Tile Co. v. O'Mara, 256 A.D. 1096, 11 N.Y.S.2d 603, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6259 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

256 A.D. 1096 (Standard Tile Co. v. O'Mara) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Benson Park Associates LLC
19 Misc. 3d 1014 (New York Supreme Court, 2008)
In re Carl R. Cacioppo Electrical Contractors, Inc.
259 A.D.2d 698 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Harlem Plumbing Supply Co. v. Handelsman
40 A.D.2d 768 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1972)
Cooper v. Emmanuele
25 A.D.2d 809 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1966)