Standard Steel Car Co. v. United States

61 Ct. Cl. 391, 1925 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 324, 1925 WL 2746
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Standard Steel Car Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 60 Ct. Cl. 726
United States Court of Claims·Decided December 7, 1925·No. No. A-307·Published

Opinion

Per curiam:

The application for appeal is overruled because the court is of opinion that the statute authorizing appeals relates to final judgments upon the whole case and not to an order sustaining a demurrer to a proposed counterclaim by the Government. Counterclaims may be filed (sec. 145, Judicial Code), and the court is required to render judgment “ upon the whole case ” (sec. 146). A ruling as to the validity of the counterclaim is interlocutory. The final judgment from which an appeal is authorized has not been entered, and the Government should not be allowed, by appeal, to suspend the further prosecution of the case pending an appeal from this interlocutory order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Standard Steel Car Co. v. United States, 61 Ct. Cl. 391, 1925 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 324, 1925 WL 2746 (cc 1925).

61 Ct. Cl. 391 (Standard Steel Car Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.