Standard Pipe & Supply Co. v. Superior Court

51 P.2d 910, 9 Cal. App. 2d 769, 1935 Cal. App. LEXIS 1232
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedNovember 1, 1935
DocketCiv. No. 10489
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 51 P.2d 910 (Standard Pipe & Supply Co. v. Superior Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Standard Pipe & Supply Co. v. Superior Court, 51 P.2d 910, 9 Cal. App. 2d 769, 1935 Cal. App. LEXIS 1232 (Cal. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

EDMONDS, J., pro tem.

Petitioner in this matter is in exactly the same situation as the petitioner in Oil Well Supply Co. v. Superior Court (ante, p. 624 [51 Pac. (2d) 908]), this day decided. As a creditor of Wigle & McBride and a beneficiary under the declaration of trust there referred to its rights to the trust property are also about to be determined by the superior court by an order to be made upon the report and account of the trustee.

Eor the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the other proceeding it is ordered that the respondent superior court be and it is hereby prohibited from making or entering any judgment, order or decree in the Matter of Trusteeship of Wigle & McBride, Inc., a Corporation, No. 298-436 in said court.

Let a peremptory writ of prohibition issue accordingly.

York, Acting P. J., and Doran, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Landis v. City of Roseburg
411 P.2d 282 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 P.2d 910, 9 Cal. App. 2d 769, 1935 Cal. App. LEXIS 1232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/standard-pipe-supply-co-v-superior-court-calctapp-1935.