Standard Paper Products, Inc. v. Corbisiero

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Standard Paper Products, Inc. v. Corbisiero

169 A.D.2d 594, 564 N.Y.S.2d 747, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 725

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 29, 1991

StatusPublished

This text of 169 A.D.2d 594 (Standard Paper Products, Inc. v. Corbisiero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Standard Paper Products, Inc. v. Corbisiero, 169 A.D.2d 594, 564 N.Y.S.2d 747, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 725 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

Petition in this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Stanley Parness, J.), entered on January 30, 1990, challenging a determination by respondent, New York State Racing and Wagering Board, dated November 1, 1989, which, after a hearing, upheld a determination of its Division of Wagering Systems denying petitioner games of chance and bingo supplier’s licenses, is unanimously denied, respondents’ determination confirmed, and the petition is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

Substantial evidence existed to support the Board’s determination to deny petitioner a games of chance supplier’s license and a bingo supplier’s license, since the hearing evidence substantiates the Board’s findings that Shelley and Jody Wild-man, as officers and stockholders of petitioner, willfully made material false statements in petitioner’s license applications, and that they lacked good moral character (General Municipal Law § 189-a; Executive Law § 435; 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Carro, Kupferman and Kassal, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition in this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Stanley Parness, J.), entered on January 30, 1990, challenging a determination by respondent, New York State Racing and Wagering Board, dated November 1, 1989, which, after a hearing, upheld a determination of its Division of Wagering Systems denying petitioner games of chance and bingo supplier’s licenses, is unanimously denied, respondents’ determination confirmed, and the petition is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

Substantial evidence existed to support the Board’s determination to deny petitioner a games of chance supplier’s license and a bingo supplier’s license, since the hearing evidence substantiates the Board’s findings that Shelley and Jody Wild-man, as officers and stockholders of petitioner, willfully made material false statements in petitioner’s license applications, and that they lacked good moral character (General Municipal Law § 189-a; Executive Law § 435; 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Carro, Kupferman and Kassal, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

169 A.D.2d 594, 564 N.Y.S.2d 747, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 725, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/standard-paper-products-inc-v-corbisiero-nyappdiv-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack