Standard Oil Development Corp. v. Marzall

D.C. Circuit

Standard Oil Development Corp. v. Marzall

195 F.2d 44, 90 U.S. App. D.C. 205

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedFebruary 7, 1952

Docket11067_1

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 195 F.2d 44 (Standard Oil Development Corp. v. Marzall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Standard Oil Development Corp. v. Marzall, 195 F.2d 44, 90 U.S. App. D.C. 205 (D.C. Cir. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from dismissal of a complaint under R.S. § 4915, 35 U.S.C.A. § 63, to obtain a patent on an improved process for treating gaseous fluids with solid materials, and more particularly for converting hydrocarbon oils in the presence of solid catalysts. We think the District Court was not clearly wrong in finding, in substantial agreement with the Patent Office, that the appealed claims do not show invention over the prior art.

Affirmed.

MILLER, Circuit Judge, dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from dismissal of a complaint under R.S. § 4915, 35 U.S.C.A. § 63, to obtain a patent on an improved process for treating gaseous fluids with solid materials, and more particularly for converting hydrocarbon oils in the presence of solid catalysts. We think the District Court was not clearly wrong in finding, in substantial agreement with the Patent Office, that the appealed claims do not show invention over the prior art.

Affirmed.

MILLER, Circuit Judge, dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

195 F.2d 44, 90 U.S. App. D.C. 205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/standard-oil-development-corp-v-marzall-cadc-1952.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack