Standard Oil Co. v. State

Court of Claims of Illinois

Standard Oil Co. v. State

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 552, 1931 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 130

CourtCourt of Claims of Illinois

DecidedMay 14, 1931

DocketNo. 1669

StatusPublished

This text of 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 552 (Standard Oil Co. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Claims of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Standard Oil Co. v. State, 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 552, 1931 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 130 (Ill. Super. Ct. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Thomas

delivered the opinion of the court:

This claim is for $56.90 motor fuel tax alleged to have been paid through mistake by claimant under the provisions of the Motor Fuel Act of 1927. Claimant was a licensed distributor of motor fuel and as such sold to the Bed, White and Blue Oil Company 2845 gallons of motor fuel in August, 1927. In its September report to the Department of Finance it included this motor fuel and paid the tax thereon. The Bed, White and Blue Oil Company, a licensed distributor of motor fuel, also included this same motor fuel in its report to the Department of Finance in September and paid the tax on it. The Bed, White and Blue Oil Company refused to reimburse claimant for the tax and it has filed this claim to have the State refund the tax to it. It has been stipulated that the Bed, White and Blue Oil Company was primarily liable for the payment of the tax and that the tax was paid by claimant “by mistake and through error,” but the stipulation does not state whether the mistake was one of fact or of law. We think from the facts disclosed by the declaration, exhibits and stipulation that the tax was paid by claimant under the view that the provisions of the statute required it to pay the tax. There is no question but what claimant paid the tax voluntarily, and it is well settled that taxes voluntarily paid under a mistake of law cannot be recovered back. This principle of law has been many times announced by our Supreme Court. (Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Boys, 296 Ill. 166; Richardson Lubricating Co. v. Kinney, 337 Ill. 122; Illinois Merchants Trust Co. v. Harvey, 335 Ill. 284.)

The claim is therefore denied and the case dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Thomas

delivered the opinion of the court:

This claim is for $56.90 motor fuel tax alleged to have been paid through mistake by claimant under the provisions of the Motor Fuel Act of 1927. Claimant was a licensed distributor of motor fuel and as such sold to the Bed, White and Blue Oil Company 2845 gallons of motor fuel in August, 1927. In its September report to the Department of Finance it included this motor fuel and paid the tax thereon. The Bed, White and Blue Oil Company, a licensed distributor of motor fuel, also included this same motor fuel in its report to the Department of Finance in September and paid the tax on it. The Bed, White and Blue Oil Company refused to reimburse claimant for the tax and it has filed this claim to have the State refund the tax to it. It has been stipulated that the Bed, White and Blue Oil Company was primarily liable for the payment of the tax and that the tax was paid by claimant “by mistake and through error,” but the stipulation does not state whether the mistake was one of fact or of law. We think from the facts disclosed by the declaration, exhibits and stipulation that the tax was paid by claimant under the view that the provisions of the statute required it to pay the tax. There is no question but what claimant paid the tax voluntarily, and it is well settled that taxes voluntarily paid under a mistake of law cannot be recovered back. This principle of law has been many times announced by our Supreme Court. (Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Boys, 296 Ill. 166; Richardson Lubricating Co. v. Kinney, 337 Ill. 122; Illinois Merchants Trust Co. v. Harvey, 335 Ill. 284.)

The claim is therefore denied and the case dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 552, 1931 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/standard-oil-co-v-state-ilclaimsct-1931.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack