Standard Oil Co. v. Koch
This text of 235 A.D. 809 (Standard Oil Co. v. Koch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. The guaranty sued upon under the authority of Sun Oil Co. v. Heller (248 N. Y. 28), sufficiently meets the requirements of the Statute of Frauds,* the consideration being clearly implied in the writing. Notwithstanding there were no purchases thereafter made by defendant’s company, there was ample consideration established by the proof to support the promise of the defendant to pay his company’s debt. His partnership guaranty upon which he might have been sued was released and the lien thereby created on his real estate was removed. These steps included forbearance against his personal obligation besides constituting a consideration moving to the defendant and beneficial to him. The fact that the true consideration was not stated in the instrument is immaterial “ if there was another good and valuable consideration for the promise.” (25 R. C. L. 664, § 298.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper and Hagarty, JJ., concur; Carswell, J., not voting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
235 A.D. 809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/standard-oil-co-v-koch-nyappdiv-1932.