Standard Oil Co. v. Donahue

226 N.E.2d 758, 10 Ohio St. 2d 134, 39 Ohio Op. 2d 121, 1967 Ohio LEXIS 382
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 19, 1967·No. Nos. 40479, 40480 and 40481·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellee, in its brief in this court, concedes that the “Jackpot” and “Tip-Top” commercials were taxable. The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals, modified by excepting therefrom the “Jackpot” and “Tip-Top” commercials, is neither unreasonable nor unlawful, and, as so modified, is affirmed. Zinc Engravers v. Bowers, Tax Commr., 168 Ohio St. 43; White Castle System, Inc., v. Bowers, Tax Commr., 172 Ohio St. 141.

Decision modified and, as modified, affirmed.

Taft, C. J., Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert and Guernsey, JJ., concur. Zimmerman and Brown, JJ., dissent. Guernsey, J., of the Third Appellate District, sitting for Schneider, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Standard Oil Co. v. Donahue, 226 N.E.2d 758, 10 Ohio St. 2d 134, 39 Ohio Op. 2d 121, 1967 Ohio LEXIS 382 (Ohio 1967).

226 N.E.2d 758 (Standard Oil Co. v. Donahue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reinhardt Vending Co. v. Porterfield
265 N.E.2d 556 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1970)