Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Standard Oil Co. v. Donahue

Standard Oil Co. v. Donahue

226 N.E.2d 758, 10 Ohio St. 2d 134, 39 Ohio Op. 2d 121, 1967 Ohio LEXIS 382
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 19, 1967
DocketNos. 40479, 40480 and 40481
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 226 N.E.2d 758 (Standard Oil Co. v. Donahue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Standard Oil Co. v. Donahue, 226 N.E.2d 758, 10 Ohio St. 2d 134, 39 Ohio Op. 2d 121, 1967 Ohio LEXIS 382 (Ohio 1967).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellee, in its brief in this court, concedes that the “Jackpot” and “Tip-Top” commercials were taxable. The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals, modified by excepting therefrom the “Jackpot” and “Tip-Top” commercials, is neither unreasonable nor unlawful, and, as so modified, is affirmed. Zinc Engravers v. Bowers, Tax Commr., 168 Ohio St. 43; White Castle System, Inc., v. Bowers, Tax Commr., 172 Ohio St. 141.

Decision modified and, as modified, affirmed.

Taft, C. J., Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert and Guernsey, JJ., concur. Zimmerman and Brown, JJ., dissent. Guernsey, J., of the Third Appellate District, sitting for Schneider, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reinhardt Vending Co. v. Porterfield
265 N.E.2d 556 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
226 N.E.2d 758, 10 Ohio St. 2d 134, 39 Ohio Op. 2d 121, 1967 Ohio LEXIS 382, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/standard-oil-co-v-donahue-ohio-1967.