Standard Milling Co. v. Higgins

80 F.2d 1020, 17 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 176
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedJanuary 17, 1936
DocketNo. 190
StatusPublished

This text of 80 F.2d 1020 (Standard Milling Co. v. Higgins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Standard Milling Co. v. Higgins, 80 F.2d 1020, 17 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 176 (2d Cir. 1936).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Decree reversed, and cause remanded to the District Court, with directions to enter a decree enjoining collection of the tax. An appropriate order shall be entered directing the repayment to the plaintiff of any cash, bonds, or funds which have been impounded or deposited below. Rickert Rice Mills, Inc., v. Fontenot, 56 S.Ct. 374, 80 L.Ed. -, January 13, 1936.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rickert Rice Mills, Inc. v. Fontenot
297 U.S. 110 (Supreme Court, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 F.2d 1020, 17 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/standard-milling-co-v-higgins-ca2-1936.