Standard Insurance v. Washington County

776 P.2d 1315, 97 Or. App. 687
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedJuly 26, 1989
DocketLUBA 88-109; CA A60636
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 776 P.2d 1315 (Standard Insurance v. Washington County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Standard Insurance v. Washington County, 776 P.2d 1315, 97 Or. App. 687 (Or. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Petitioner seeks review of LUBA’s decision that Washington County lacked jurisdiction to adopt an amendment to its comprehensive plan map. We held that the City of Hillsboro lacked authority to deny reconsideration of the county’s decision to adopt the same proposed amendment in Standard Ins. Co. v. City of Hillsboro, 97 Or App 625, 776 P2d 1313 (1989). As explained in that opinion, the county did not make a final and appealable land use decision. ORS 197.015(10) (a) (A). Therefore, LUBA was without jurisdiction.

Reversed and remanded with instructions to dismiss proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Standard Insurance v. City of Hillsboro
776 P.2d 1313 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
776 P.2d 1315, 97 Or. App. 687, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/standard-insurance-v-washington-county-orctapp-1989.