Standard Fertilizer Co. v. Summerell
This text of 202 N.C. 833 (Standard Fertilizer Co. v. Summerell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On tbe admissions in tbe pleadings offered in evidence by tbe plaintiff, tbe court held that tbe burden of proof on tbe issue submitted to tbe jury, without objection, was on tbe defendant. In tbis there was no error. Trust Co. v. Anagnos, 196 N. C., 327, 145 S. E., 609. Tbe evidence offered by tbe plaintiff in contradiction of tbe evidence offered by tbe defendant was properly admitted. Swift & Co. v. Aydlett, 192 N. C., 340, 135 S. E., 141. Tbe evidence was submitted to tbe jury under instructions which are free from error. Tbe defense relied on by tbe defendant was not sustained. There is no error in tbe judgment. It is affirmed.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
202 N.C. 833, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/standard-fertilizer-co-v-summerell-nc-1932.