Standard Dry Wall Products, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
This text of 188 F.2d 362 (Standard Dry Wall Products, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petitioner, Standard Dry Wall Products, Inc., insists that there is not sufficient evidence on “the whole record” as that phrase is used in the Administrative Procedure Act, 60 Stat. 237, as amended, 5 U.S.C.A. § 1001 et seq. and the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, *363 61 Stat. 136, 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq., in the light of the decisions of the Supreme Court in Universal Camera Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, 71 S.Ct. 456, and National Labor Relations Board v. Pittsburgh Steamship Company, 71 S.Ct. 453, to support the Board’s findings that the petitioner violated Section 8(a) (1) and (3) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 61 Stat. 140, 29 U.S.C.A. § 158(a) (1) and (3). We conclude that the evidence supporting the Board’s decision is substantial when viewed in the light furnished by the record in its entirety, including the body of evidence opposed to the Board’s view. We are also of the opinion that the decision of the Board is reasonable and fair.
We will enforce the Board’s order. A decree may be submitted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
188 F.2d 362, 27 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2631, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 3521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/standard-dry-wall-products-inc-v-national-labor-relations-board-ca3-1951.