Standard Dredging Corp.

Court of Claims

Standard Dredging Corp.

23 Cont. Cas. Fed. 81,097, 207 Ct. Cl. 1044, 1975 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 151

CourtUnited States Court of Claims

DecidedOctober 30, 1975

DocketNo. 275-72

StatusPublished

This text of 23 Cont. Cas. Fed. 81,097 (Standard Dredging Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Standard Dredging Corp., 23 Cont. Cas. Fed. 81,097, 207 Ct. Cl. 1044, 1975 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 151 (cc 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

On September 12,1974 Trial Judge C. Murray Bernhardt filed a recommended decision (reported at 20 CCF para. 83,354), concluding that plaintiff was not entitled to additional compensation for costs incurred as a result of ruptures of dikes holding dredged material. This case came before the court on plaintiff’s request for review by the court of the said recommended decision on plaintiff’s and defendant’s motions for summary judgment, having been submitted to the court without oral argument. Since the court (Davis, Judge Presiding, Skelton and Ktjnzig, Judges') agrees with the recommended decision, on October 30,1975 it affirmed and adopted the same as the 'basis for its judgment in this case, denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, granted defendant’s cross-motion, and dismissed the petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On September 12,1974 Trial Judge C. Murray Bernhardt filed a recommended decision (reported at 20 CCF para. 83,354), concluding that plaintiff was not entitled to additional compensation for costs incurred as a result of ruptures of dikes holding dredged material. This case came before the court on plaintiff’s request for review by the court of the said recommended decision on plaintiff’s and defendant’s motions for summary judgment, having been submitted to the court without oral argument. Since the court (Davis, Judge Presiding, Skelton and Ktjnzig, Judges') agrees with the recommended decision, on October 30,1975 it affirmed and adopted the same as the 'basis for its judgment in this case, denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, granted defendant’s cross-motion, and dismissed the petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 Cont. Cas. Fed. 81,097, 207 Ct. Cl. 1044, 1975 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/standard-dredging-corp-cc-1975.