Standard Distilling Co. v. Freyhan

51 N.W. 976, 34 Neb. 434, 1892 Neb. LEXIS 143
Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided April 7, 1892·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Norval, J.

This is a proceeding in error to reverse the ruling of the district court sustaining the defendant’s motion to quash the service of the summons. The transcript fails to show that a final judgment has been entered in the court below. The case is ruled by Persinger v. Tinkel, ante, p. 5. It was there held,that the court would not review an order of the district court quashing the service of a summons until after the final disposition of the action, for the reason that such ruling is not a final order. The petition in error is

Dismissed.

The other judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Standard Distilling Co. v. Freyhan, 51 N.W. 976, 34 Neb. 434, 1892 Neb. LEXIS 143 (Neb. 1892).

51 N.W. 976 (Standard Distilling Co. v. Freyhan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Busboom v. Gregory
137 N.W.2d 825 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1965)
Erdman v. National Indemnity Company
133 N.W.2d 472 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1965)
Lewis v. Barker
65 N.W. 778 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1896)