Standard Distilling Co. v. Freyhan

51 N.W. 976, 34 Neb. 434, 1892 Neb. LEXIS 143
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedApril 7, 1892
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 51 N.W. 976 (Standard Distilling Co. v. Freyhan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Standard Distilling Co. v. Freyhan, 51 N.W. 976, 34 Neb. 434, 1892 Neb. LEXIS 143 (Neb. 1892).

Opinion

Norval, J.

This is a proceeding in error to reverse the ruling of the district court sustaining the defendant’s motion to quash the service of the summons. The transcript fails to show that a final judgment has been entered in the court below. The case is ruled by Persinger v. Tinkel, ante, p. 5. It was there held,that the court would not review an order of the district court quashing the service of a summons until after the final disposition of the action, for the reason that such ruling is not a final order. The petition in error is

Dismissed.

The other judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Busboom v. Gregory
137 N.W.2d 825 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1965)
Erdman v. National Indemnity Company
133 N.W.2d 472 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1965)
Lewis v. Barker
65 N.W. 778 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1896)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 N.W. 976, 34 Neb. 434, 1892 Neb. LEXIS 143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/standard-distilling-co-v-freyhan-neb-1892.