Standard Chartered Bank v. Kittay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Standard Chartered Bank v. Kittay

215 A.D.2d 644, 628 N.Y.S.2d 486, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5446

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 22, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 215 A.D.2d 644 (Standard Chartered Bank v. Kittay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Standard Chartered Bank v. Kittay, 215 A.D.2d 644, 628 N.Y.S.2d 486, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5446 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action pursuant to Debtor and Creditor Law article 10 to set aside a transfer of real property, the defendant Muriel Kittay appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brucia, J.), dated June 1, 1994, which denied her motion, denominated as one for renewal, but which was, in effect, for reargument of the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment.

[645]*645Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument.

The appellant did not demonstrate a valid excuse for her failure to produce the affidavits purportedly containing new evidence upon her unexplained 12-month delay in moving to renew. Therefore, her motion was actually one for reargument, the denial of which is not appealable (see, Robinson v Laurent, 205 AD2d 517, 518). Bracken, J. P., Joy, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action pursuant to Debtor and Creditor Law article 10 to set aside a transfer of real property, the defendant Muriel Kittay appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brucia, J.), dated June 1, 1994, which denied her motion, denominated as one for renewal, but which was, in effect, for reargument of the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment.

[645]*645Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument.

The appellant did not demonstrate a valid excuse for her failure to produce the affidavits purportedly containing new evidence upon her unexplained 12-month delay in moving to renew. Therefore, her motion was actually one for reargument, the denial of which is not appealable (see, Robinson v Laurent, 205 AD2d 517, 518). Bracken, J. P., Joy, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

215 A.D.2d 644, 628 N.Y.S.2d 486, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5446, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/standard-chartered-bank-v-kittay-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack