Standard Cellulose & Novelty Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Standard Cellulose & Novelty Co. v. United States

58 Cust. Ct. 175, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2504

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedMarch 15, 1967

DocketC.D. 2923

StatusPublished

This text of 58 Cust. Ct. 175 (Standard Cellulose & Novelty Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Standard Cellulose & Novelty Co. v. United States, 58 Cust. Ct. 175, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2504 (cusc 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Kao, Chief Judge:

When this case was called for trial, there was no appearance by or on behalf of plaintiff although due notice of the time and place of trial had been provided. Accordingly, the defendant moved to dismiss the action for want of prosecution.

It appearing from the official papers herein that the entry was liquidated on February 28, 1964, but that the protest was not filed until April 30,1964, or more than 60 days after liquidation, the protest is untimely. The motion of defendant to dismiss for lack of prosecution is, therefore, denied, but the protest is dismissed as untimely.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kao, Chief Judge:

When this case was called for trial, there was no appearance by or on behalf of plaintiff although due notice of the time and place of trial had been provided. Accordingly, the defendant moved to dismiss the action for want of prosecution.

It appearing from the official papers herein that the entry was liquidated on February 28, 1964, but that the protest was not filed until April 30,1964, or more than 60 days after liquidation, the protest is untimely. The motion of defendant to dismiss for lack of prosecution is, therefore, denied, but the protest is dismissed as untimely.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 Cust. Ct. 175, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/standard-cellulose-novelty-co-v-united-states-cusc-1967.