Standard Capital Corp. v. J. C. Berkwit & Co.

248 A.D. 214, 288 N.Y.S. 1007, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6119

This text of 248 A.D. 214 (Standard Capital Corp. v. J. C. Berkwit & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Standard Capital Corp. v. J. C. Berkwit & Co., 248 A.D. 214, 288 N.Y.S. 1007, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6119 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We agree with the Special Term that the plaintiff is entitled to recover the amount expended in collecting the note, including attorney’s fees. We are of opinion, however, that it may not recover, in addition to these expenses, a ten per cent collection charge. The ten per cent collection charge in addition to all other expenses which might be incurred in enforcing payment of the note necessarily constituted a forfeiture and not liquidated damages.

The order appealed from in so far as it grants plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, and the judgment entered thereon, should be reversed, with costs, and the motion for summary judgment denied, with ten dollars costs.

Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Order in so far as it grants plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, and the judgment entered thereon, unanimously reversed, with costs, and the motion for summary judgment denied, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
248 A.D. 214, 288 N.Y.S. 1007, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/standard-capital-corp-v-j-c-berkwit-co-nyappdiv-1936.