Standard Accident Insurance v. Marks

233 A.D. 466, 253 N.Y.S. 342, 1931 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11331
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 13, 1931
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 233 A.D. 466 (Standard Accident Insurance v. Marks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Standard Accident Insurance v. Marks, 233 A.D. 466, 253 N.Y.S. 342, 1931 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11331 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Our affirmance of the order denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (228 App. Div. 769) is not conclusive of the question here presented. It was a holding merely that the defendant had presented a triable issue. Nor by our affirmance did we adopt the reasoning of Special Term.

In the circumstances we are of opinion that the motion to amend should have been granted.

The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted upon payment of taxable costs to the date of the making of the motion.

Present — Finch, P. J., McAvoy, Martin, O’Malley and Townley, JJ.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted on payment of taxable costs to date of the making of the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Del Grosso v. Board of Trustees
113 Misc. 2d 440 (New York Supreme Court, 1982)
Muramato v. Blidberg Rothchild Co., Inc.
94 F. Supp. 131 (S.D. New York, 1950)
Segar v. King Features Syndicate, Inc.
175 Misc. 25 (New York Supreme Court, 1940)
Neivel Realty Corp. v. Prudence Bonds Corp.
151 Misc. 737 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
233 A.D. 466, 253 N.Y.S. 342, 1931 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/standard-accident-insurance-v-marks-nyappdiv-1931.