Stanczuk v. Pfent

204 N.W. 706, 231 Mich. 689
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided July 16, 1925·No. Docket No. 24.·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Suit was commenced by declaration. There was judgment by default. More than six months after entry of default defendant moved to set it aside, showing, as we find, that at the time of entry of default there was not a return of service of the declaration, as the practice requires. 3 Comp. Laws 1915, § 12441. The motion by order was denied. Defendant brings error.

In facts and in applicable law the case is likeWhirl v. Reiner, 229 Mich. 114. The default was irregular and, under the holding in the Whirl Case, ought to have been set aside. No other question merits discussion.

The order, the judgment, and the default are set aside, and defendant permitted to plead on terms to be fixed by the trial court, with costs to appellant.

McDONALD, C.J., and BIRD, SHARPE, MOORE, STEERE, FELLOWS, and WIEST, JJ., concurred. *Page 691

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stanczuk v. Pfent, 204 N.W. 706, 231 Mich. 689 (Mich. 1925).

204 N.W. 706 (Stanczuk v. Pfent) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Borg v. Thomas
62 N.W.2d 466 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1954)
Smak v. Gwozdik
291 N.W. 270 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1940)
McHenry v. Village of Groose Pointe Farms
251 N.W. 783 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1933)
Dades v. Central Mutual Auto Insurance
248 N.W. 616 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1933)
Burk v. Amos
247 N.W. 197 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1933)
Standard Oil Co. v. Brukwinski
217 N.W. 922 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1928)