Stancle v. Florida Commission on Offender Review
This text of Stancle v. Florida Commission on Offender Review (Stancle v. Florida Commission on Offender Review) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2022-3826 _____________________________
RUFUS STANCLE,
Petitioner,
v.
FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Certiorari—Original Jurisdiction.
April 24, 2024
PER CURIAM.
The Court denies the petition for writ of certiorari on the merits.
OSTERHAUS, C.J., and BILBREY and NORDBY, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Rufus Stancle, pro se, Petitioner.
Rana Wallace, General Counsel, and Alex A. Christiano, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Commission on Offender Review, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Stancle v. Florida Commission on Offender Review, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stancle-v-florida-commission-on-offender-review-fladistctapp-2024.