Stancil v. Ace USA

23 A.3d 338, 207 N.J. 66, 2011 N.J. LEXIS 877
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 7, 2011·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in A-001438-09 having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted, limited to whether — and without regard to the intentional — conduct exception provided for in the Workers’ Compensation Act, N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 — an employee who suffered a work-related injury has a common-law cause of action for damages against a workers’ compensation carrier for its willful failure to comply with court orders compelling it to provide medical treatment when the delay or denial of treatment causes a worsening of the employee’s medical condition and/or pain and suffering.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stancil v. Ace USA, 23 A.3d 338, 207 N.J. 66, 2011 N.J. LEXIS 877 (N.J. 2011).

23 A.3d 338 (Stancil v. Ace USA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stancil v. ACE USA
48 A.3d 991 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2012)
Beim v. Hulfish
50 A.3d 42 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2012)