Stancil v. Ace USA
This text of 23 A.3d 338 (Stancil v. Ace USA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:
A petition for certification of the judgment in A-001438-09 having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;
It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted, limited to whether — and without regard to the intentional — conduct exception provided for in the Workers’ Compensation Act, N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 — an employee who suffered a work-related injury has a common-law cause of action for damages against a workers’ compensation carrier for its willful failure to comply with court orders compelling it to provide medical treatment when the delay or denial of treatment causes a worsening of the employee’s medical condition and/or pain and suffering.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 A.3d 338, 207 N.J. 66, 2011 N.J. LEXIS 877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stancil-v-ace-usa-nj-2011.