Stancil v. Ace USA

23 A.3d 338, 207 N.J. 66, 2011 N.J. LEXIS 877
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 7, 2011
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 23 A.3d 338 (Stancil v. Ace USA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stancil v. Ace USA, 23 A.3d 338, 207 N.J. 66, 2011 N.J. LEXIS 877 (N.J. 2011).

Opinion

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in A-001438-09 having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted, limited to whether — and without regard to the intentional — conduct exception provided for in the Workers’ Compensation Act, N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 — an employee who suffered a work-related injury has a common-law cause of action for damages against a workers’ compensation carrier for its willful failure to comply with court orders compelling it to provide medical treatment when the delay or denial of treatment causes a worsening of the employee’s medical condition and/or pain and suffering.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stancil v. ACE USA
48 A.3d 991 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2012)
Beim v. Hulfish
50 A.3d 42 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 A.3d 338, 207 N.J. 66, 2011 N.J. LEXIS 877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stancil-v-ace-usa-nj-2011.