Stancell v. Pryor

25 Ga. 40
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 15, 1858
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 25 Ga. 40 (Stancell v. Pryor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stancell v. Pryor, 25 Ga. 40 (Ga. 1858).

Opinion

By the Court.

McDonald, J.

delivering the opinion.

The declaration in this case might have been amended by alleging a colloquium, that the defendant’s steel-trap had been stolen, with suitable averments, that the words were spoken of and concerning the plaintiff, in reference thereto; and on proof of the said allegations with the words, the action might have been sustained. The Court below held that if the words as proven had been actionable, the declaration might have been amended, but we understood the decision to be, that the declaration could not have been so amended as to have sustained an action upon the words: words in themselves not actionable may be made so by avering a colloquium with suitable averments to apply the speaking to the subject.

Judgment reversed,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vedovi v. Watson & Taylor
285 P. 418 (California Court of Appeal, 1930)
Jarman v. Rea
70 P. 216 (California Supreme Court, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 Ga. 40, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stancell-v-pryor-ga-1858.